Quantcast
 

Facebook Rejects Ad for Lesbian Film 'And Then Came Lola'

by Boo Jarchow | Article Date: 04/24/2009 1:35 PM
Facebook Rejects Ad for Lesbian Film 'And Then Came Lola'
 

Facebook has mysteriously rejected an advertisement for the Fast Girl Film's project And Then Came Lola, which stars Jill Bennett, Ashleigh Sumner, and Cathy DeBuono. The photo depicts the three lesbians in what coproducer Ellen Seidler calls the "sandwich shot," a sexy but by no means gratuitous shot of three women holding each other.

Of course, the social networking zeitgeist Facebook employs a slew of guidelines that ads must adhere to in order to be used, but apparently they only apply those guidelines part of the time. Those in charge of Facebook ads rejected the And Then Came Lola advertisement on the following basis: 

"The image of this ad is either irrelevant or inappropriate. Per sections 3 and 8 of Facebook's Advertising Guidelines, the image on your ad should be relevant and appropriate to the item being advertised. Make sure your image is directly relevant to what you are advertising. Images that are overly explicit, provocative, or that reveal too much skin are not allowed. Images that may either degrade or idealize any health condition or body type are also not allowed. If you choose to submit this ad again, please use an appropriate image that adheres to all of Facebook's Advertising Guidelines."

Here is the ad that Fast Girl Films submitted to Facebook:

Seidler told SheWired that she was using targeted Facebook ads only, which means the And Then Came Lola ads would only appear on pages of women interested in women and women over 18 years of age.

In the Ads FAQ section on Facebook, regarding image disapproval gives a link to the Advertising Guidelines, where they say:

"Facebook is committed to protecting our user experience by keeping the site clean, uncluttered, and free from intrusive advertising. We believe that we can help transform existing advertising on Facebook into tailored messages to our users, because they are based on how their friends interact and affiliate with the brands, music artists, and businesses they care about."

On the Facebook Page for the film, screen grabs of advertisements with straight people shirtless, making out, and in comparable positions to the And Then Came Lola ad are posted.  Some ads Facebook has accepted include women's bare legs, one woman swapping spit with a man, and even blood, are all approved. A status update for the film's Page made a point with the question that "blood is ok, but smiles aren't?"

 

 

FIRST PAGE PAGE 1 LAST PAGE
share Share/Save/Bookmark
Facebook Rejects Ad for Lesbian Film 'And Then Came Lola'
 

     
sarah view my profile
Friday, April 24 2009 | 19:30:34
Ridiculous
That must be the most blantant case of a
double standard I've yet seen in my middle
aged life.
nikki3 view my profile
Friday, April 24 2009 | 20:25:50
Hm,
maybe they thought the picture was to hot and
would induce heart attacks! Then they would
be held lible. Jk, Its ignorant, narrow
minded things like this that keep us from
cohabitating together in a peaceful world.
Maybe one day that will change if we all keep
pushing forward.
Fastlane view my profile
Friday, April 24 2009 | 21:09:37
FACEBOOK GROUP!
In support of the film and in protest to
facebook a lot of us have changed our profile
pictures to the image shown above and have
posted links to it on our walls stating our
outrage at the censorship. There is also a
facebook group dedicated to making things
right.. join the group And then Facebook
Shunned Lola! Help get the point across by
doing the same!
CruellaDevoid view my profile
Saturday, April 25 2009 | 16:41:21
Heh....
It's kind of twisted that facebook wouldn't
allow this any face time. But the fact that
this happened is going to lead, likely, to a
quicker demise than had they stood their
ground. It's really sad how a corporation can
buckle under the screaming complaints of some
ignorant moron.
Kate view my profile
Sunday, April 26 2009 | 10:51:42
The arbitrary nature
of Facebooks decision in regards to this is
quite suspect. Pretty sure they cannot
justify their decision, especially when
presidence shows they're allowing other adds
of a similar nature to a straight audience.
goddesstopaz view my profile
Sunday, April 26 2009 | 20:11:58
Censorship
Call the NY Civil Liberties Union!!! First
Amendment rights! This ad is totally
inoffensive... actually very tasteful! I
think every Lesbitarian will agree. That'll
really get the flick some attention!!!
Laura55 view my profile
Monday, April 27 2009 | 09:32:36
facebook police inconsistent
What the filmmakers call "fun and flirty" I
call somewhat racy - it goes beyond "flirty,"
to me, due to the hand placements. Maybe I
just don't flirt like that.

Still, I do
not find it offensive at all. More offensive
is seeing photos of people swapping spit (gay
or straight) in an ad and even more offensive
is a picture of a colon, a scary 6-eyed baby,
Jennifer Aniston's face on every page I go
to, and the objectification of women by
showing just our body parts, no faces. I'm a
straight woman, and this makes me angry too.
goddesstopaz view my profile
Monday, April 27 2009 | 13:56:49
Blue Ribbon Online ree Speech Campaign
Join Free Speech Online (if FB doesn't delete
this)
coachsappho view my profile
Tuesday, April 28 2009 | 06:14:12
facebook rejecting lesbian ads
I have to say this happened to me recently as
well. I had been trying to set up a 'fan'
group for my singles club for lesbians called
Lez Rendezvous. They kept denying me even
though I tried it several times. Then I
emailed them and got this very generic 'dead
end' email that didn't resolve anything.
So, as of today, the Lez Rendezvous fan group
isn't up on facebook. I assume it's the word
'lez' that's creating the problem. I've
heard other lesbian business' say they have
groups up there with lesbian in the name
without a problem so I don't know what gives!
I wonder if the ad for 'And then came
Lola' could be toned down a bit. And then
resubmit? After all, the most important
thing is getting the word out there vs.
taking on a fight about the potential
discriminatory policy with facebook which
maybe should be done but will be a longer
term battle.

Then again too maybe we can
get some of the organizations designed to
address this problem to help us? Perhaps a
group like Power UP or what's it's name (I am
googling right now but can't seem to find the
group I am thinking of)....
HersbandAndWife view my profile
Tuesday, April 28 2009 | 11:39:54
We were already deleted from FB once waiting on 2nd time
This does not surprise us as they already
deleted us from FB once and are now waiting
for 2nd time.
They said we were too
controversial... WHATEVER!!
All we have ever
done was talk about life and how to deal with
it so you don't go crazy.
Since when is gay
"dear Abby" advice controversial?
What cause
we tell people the way we think they can work
it out?
Or because we advocate any type of
relationship that makes humans happy with
other humans?
Who knows.. but we tend to
think it is the Gay thing.
Check out our
page and let us know what you think it may
be.. maybe we are wrong, and maybe we are
controversial.
http://www.hersbandandwife.com
starbuck view my profile
Tuesday, April 28 2009 | 15:37:24
update
Was just on 'And Then Came Lola" site on
facebook and they have overturned the ruling
and are allowing the ad!
Leofire75 view my profile
Wednesday, April 29 2009 | 03:49:37
Sticking to our guns...
Wonderful news, starbuck!!! The film
deserves the same opportunity to reach its
intended target as the other approved ads
have achieved. The rejection of the ad
seemed like a bad and ridiculously lame
joke...so glad we got the last laugh.
Great to hear FB came to its senses and did
the right thing. Nothing like bad press to
turn the heat on to change FB's negative
reputation. Hopefully, there won't be any
similar issues involved with LGBT related ads
in the future. Maybe the outcome of this can
set a good example.

I realize now this
wasn't just about FB and combating their
insane guidelines. Nor was it just about
seeking approval for the ad. And it also
wasn't simply about getting a fair deal.
Ultimately, it was about sticking to one's
guns when faced with opposition. Sometimes
you have no choice and are forced to cause a
scene, but eventually your voice is heard in
the end.
 
POST A NEW COMMENT
User Name
Password
Subject
Comments
Enter Code:
 
No account needed! Fill out a simple form and comment on your favorite articles.

 
01. SheWired's Shot of the Day: Lea Michele Sans Pants for 'Glamour' SheWired's Shot of the Day: Lea Michele Sans Pants for 'Glamour'
Recent comments on this story:
Gleek Girl "Is it wrong that my mind immediately went to thinking that L..."
By: Gleek Girl | [article]
> more comments on this story